Genetic drift and gene flow
Log in to starLast updated 3mo ago
Log in to add personal notes on this page.
Genetic drift is the random change in allele frequency from generation to generation due to finite population size: a sampling effect. Gene flow, in contrast, is the transfer of alleles between populations via migration. Both modify allele frequencies independently of selection and are core violators of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.
- Random sampling: in each generation, only a finite number of gametes contribute to the next generation. Rare alleles are especially vulnerable to stochastic loss.
- Magnitude scales inversely with effective population size (Ne): small populations drift much faster than large ones.
- Effect: allele frequencies fluctuate over generations; ultimately an allele is either lost (frequency = 0) or fixed (frequency = 1) unless countered by mutation, migration, or selection.
- Over long time, drift alone produces substantial between-population divergence and is a key force in neutral molecular evolution.
- Bottleneck effect: a dramatic reduction in population size (disease, famine, war) leaves a small surviving population with allele frequencies diverged by chance from the original. Example: northern elephant seals passed through a 20-individual bottleneck in the 19th century and show very low genetic diversity today.
- Founder effect: a specific form of bottleneck where a new population is established by few founders (see separate page).
- Introduction of alleles from one population into another via migrating individuals who reproduce.
- Homogenizes populations; opposes drift and selection-driven divergence.
- In humans, ongoing gene flow means that ancestry-based frequency estimates become less predictive over generations (e.g., admixed individuals carrying founder variants outside the traditional ancestral population).
- Quantified using measures like FST (genetic distance between populations). FST close to 0 implies high gene flow / low divergence; FST close to 1 implies strong differentiation.
- Variant frequency estimates depend on population sampling. A rare variant common in one ancestry (founder effect + drift) may be absent in another, affecting carrier-screening sensitivity.
- Admixed populations pose challenges for ancestry-based screening and variant interpretation. Databases like gnomAD provide population-specific allele frequencies that improve variant classification (ACMG BA1/BS1 criteria rely on these).
- Conservation genetics: the same principles apply to endangered species; small Ne leads to drift, loss of diversity, and inbreeding depression.
- Drift = random, bigger in small populations. Gene flow = directional, homogenizing.
- Ne (effective population size) is smaller than census size; it reflects only reproducing individuals, skewed sex ratios, and bottlenecks.
- A rare variant newly common in a population suggests founder effect / drift, positive selection, or gene flow from another population: three distinct hypotheses with different evidence.
- Hardy-Weinberg assumes no drift, no migration, no selection, no mutation, and random mating. Real populations violate these.